linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio/gpio-generic: read set register for caching if available

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 04 Jul 2011 17:57:16 +0200
From:	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sodaville@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio/gpio-generic: read set register for caching
 if available

Grant Likely wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-generic.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-generic.c
>> index 231714d..9f8b5c6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-generic.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-generic.c
>> @@ -398,7 +398,10 @@ int __devinit bgpio_init(struct bgpio_chip *bgc,
>>  	if (ret)
>>  		return ret;
>>  
>> -	bgc->data = bgc->read_reg(bgc->reg_dat);
>> +	if (bgc->reg_set)
>> +		bgc->data = bgc->read_reg(bgc->reg_set);
> 
> On most of the gpio controllers that I've seen, the 'set' register
> isn't something that you can actually read.  I don't think this is
> something that can be done for all gpio controllers.

I see. So

	if (bgc->reg_set && ! bgc->reg_clr)

instead should be fine, right?

> g.
> 
Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/