linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 0/6] arm_smp_twd: mpcore

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 06 Jul 2011 16:27:41 +0400
From:	Vitaly Kuzmichev <vkuzmichev@...sta.com>
To:	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
CC:	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org" <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
	"arm@...nel.org" <arm@...nel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
	Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/6] arm_smp_twd: mpcore_wdt: Fix MPCORE watchdog setup

Hi Marc,

On 07/06/2011 02:05 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
[...]
>> The series of patches is based on arm-platforms.git/local_timers_as_devices
>> branch since it looks like that it is going to be merged into the mainline.
> 
> Be careful here. This branch is a work in progress, likely to change
> very quickly, contains code that has not been posted to the ML yet, and
> will probably eat your pet for breakfast. As far as mainline merging is
> concerned, there is still a long way to go (see the GIC consolidation
> patches, on which the local_timers_as_devices branch relies).

I understand.
When do you plan to finish this job?
Would not it be better to prepare two sets of patches: first one for
linux-2.6/master with exported function, second for arm-platforms.git
with removing exported function and replacing use of it by
clk_get_rate(smp_twd) call?
Is there a chance in this case, that my patches will be merged much
earlier than yours?
If not, I will just rework patch 2/6 to remove exported and use only
clock interface.


Thanks,
Vitaly.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/