linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] compat_ioctl: fix make headers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 6 Jul 2011 16:11:32 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Johannes Stezenbach <js@...21.net>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] compat_ioctl: fix make headers_check regression

On Thu, 7 Jul 2011 00:51:40 +0200
Johannes Stezenbach <js@...21.net> wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 12:03:16PM +0200, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
> > Fix headers_check error introduced by 390192b30057:
> > 
> > include/linux/fd.h:6: included file 'linux/compat.h' is not exported
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Johannes Stezenbach <js@...21.net>
> > ---
> > I used the same style as in linux/usbdevice_fs.h, hope
> > that's OK.
> 
> 
> I just got an "added to -mm tree" mail for the original patch, so I
> wonder what's with this fix?

What does the "original patch" refer to.

Also, there's no commit 390192b30057.  Commit ID's can change.  This is
why we ask people to also include the patch title when describing
patches by SHA ID's



Please let's just start again.  Tell us what is going on here.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/