linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 7 Jul 2011 12:53:15 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc:	x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v3


* Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:

> From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
> 
> I got a request to make it easier to determine the microcode update level
> on Intel CPUs. This patch adds a new "microcode" field to /proc/cpuinfo.
> 
> The microcode level is also outputed on fatal machine checks together
> with the other CPUID model information.
> 
> I removed the respective code from the microcode update driver, it
> just reads the field from cpu_data. Also when the microcode is updated
> it fills in the new values too.
> 
> I had to add a memory barrier to native_cpuid to prevent it being
> optimized away when the result is not used.
> 
> This turns out to clean up further code which already got this
> information manually. This is done in followon patches.
> 
> v2:  Lots of updates based on feedback.
> v3:  Rename cpu_update to microcode. Misc changes from feedback.
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h  |    4 +++-
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c       |   13 +++++++++++++
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c  |    9 +++++++--
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c        |    3 ++-
>  arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c |   14 +++++---------
>  5 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

You have *still* ignored some of the review suggestions i gave you in 
the previous thread, and you know that i won't apply your patches 
without you addressing all feedback.

So why did you send this incomplete series?

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/