linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/6] clk: Initial feedback for off-SoC slow bus clocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 11 Jul 2011 20:43:06 +0900
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
Cc:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Grant Likely <grant@...retlab.ca>,
	patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@...onical.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] clk: Initial feedback for off-SoC slow bus clocks

On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:46:25PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 11:28:56AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:

> > If that's all its for, then can't some other solution for debugfs names
> > (lets stop calling them clock names to avoid confusion) be found -
> > such as

> > 	sprintf(debugfsname, "%s@%p", clk->debugfsprefix, clk);

> Sounds good. During my tests on i.MX I found it very convenient to have
> speaking debugfs names, so I vote for this suggestion instead the
> following ones.

FWIW that's pretty much exactly what I added except I used a - instead
of @.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/