linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Doc:cgroup:fix a cpuset's file description in cpusets.txt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 11 Jul 2011 10:45:28 -0700
From:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
To:	Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>
Cc:	Wanlong Gao <wanlong.gao@...il.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Doc:cgroup:fix a cpuset's file description in
 cpusets.txt

On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 10:23:53 -0700 Paul Menage wrote:

> On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 1:58 AM, Wanlong Gao <wanlong.gao@...il.com> wrote:
> > Only the root cpuset has cpuset.memory_pressure_enabled flag,
> > but not the only one.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong@...fujitsu.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>

Thanks.

> The original was actually correct English, when parsed as "(the root
> cpuset only) (has the following file)", but I guess ambiguous. I'd be
> inclined to just remove the word "only", since it's unnecessary in its
> new location.

Yes, it's ambiguous and/or too restrictive.
Yes, we could just drop the word "only".

---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/