linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 01/11] MFD: DA9052 MFD core module v2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 13 Jul 2011 00:10:23 +0530
From:	Ashish Jangam <Ashish.Jangam@...tcummins.com>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	"sameo@...nedhand.com" <sameo@...nedhand.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Dajun <dajun.chen@...semi.com>,
	"linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 01/11] MFD: DA9052 MFD core module v2

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arnd Bergmann [mailto:arnd@...db.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 12:03 AM
> To: Ashish Jangam
> Cc: Mark Brown; sameo@...nedhand.com; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Dajun;
> linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] MFD: DA9052 MFD core module v2
> 
> On Monday 11 July 2011 08:57:46 Ashish Jangam wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Arnd Bergmann [mailto:arnd@...db.de]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 8:25 PM
> > > To: Ashish Jangam
> > > Cc: Mark Brown; sameo@...nedhand.com; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Dajun;
> > > linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] MFD: DA9052 MFD core module v2
> > >
> > > On Tuesday 05 July 2011, ashishj3 wrote:
> > > > The DA9052 is a highly integrated PMIC subsystem with supply domain
> > > flexibility
> > > > to support wide range of high performance application.
> > > >
> > > > It provides voltage regulators, GPIO controller, Touch Screen, RTC,
> Battery
> > > > control and other functionality.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: David Dajun Chen <dchen@...semi.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ashish Jangam <ashish.jangam@...tcummins.com>
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> > Can anyone ack this patch?
> 
> What do you think my message was? Reviewed-by is usually stronger than
> Acked-by, it means that I actually had a closer look and am now happy
> with the current state.
> 
> Of course, my Ack might not mean too much because I'm not a maintainer,
> but I still would expect to be included in 'anyone'.
> 
> 	Arnd
Sorry for that, since I was not much familiar with this terminology.

Ashish