[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110718151229.GA32167@somewhere>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 17:12:33 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [RFC 3/4] perf, ftrace: Add new perf ioctl for function trace
filter
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 03:22:55PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> As the amount of kernel functions obtained by the ftrace:function tracepoint
> is quite big, it's desirable to be able to set the filter on the ftrace
> level.
>
> Added PERF_EVENT_IOC_SET_FTRACE ioctl to be able to specify function filter
> for perf event. The interface is the same as for the set_ftrace_filter file.
>
> Also the same string parser is used as for the set_ftrace_filter file.
I'm not sure I understand why an ioctl is needed for that.
Why not using the ftrace filter?
The first idea was to do something like this:
ip == func1 || ip == func2 || ....
But that makes a too long expression. So I thought we
could bring support for the "+" operator and have expressions
like:
ip == func1 + func2 + func3 + ....
ip == !func1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists