linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.32.21 - uptime related crashes?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 21 Jul 2011 21:25:45 +0200
From:	Nikola Ciprich <nikola.ciprich@...uxbox.cz>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
	MINOURA Makoto <minoura@...inux.co.jp>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Faidon Liambotis <paravoid@...ian.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
	seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com,
	Hervé Commowick <hcommowick@...sec.fr>,
	Rand@...per.es, Nikola Ciprich <nikola.ciprich@...uxbox.cz>
Subject: Re: 2.6.32.21 - uptime related crashes?

Hello Peter,

> With a patch that frobs the starting value close to overflowing I hope,
> otherwise we'll not hear from you in like 7 months ;-)
sure. Which is the best patch to use for testing, You mean john's one?
(http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1406779#1406779)
or some other?
nik

> Yeah, I think we want to commit this with a -stable tag, Ingo?
> 

-- 
-------------------------------------
Ing. Nikola CIPRICH
LinuxBox.cz, s.r.o.
28. rijna 168, 709 01 Ostrava

tel.:   +420 596 603 142
fax:    +420 596 621 273
mobil:  +420 777 093 799

www.linuxbox.cz

mobil servis: +420 737 238 656
email servis: servis@...uxbox.cz
-------------------------------------

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped