linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for July 18 (mm/truncate.c)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 21 Jul 2011 21:50:42 +0100
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	akpm <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for July 18 (mm/truncate.c)

On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:21:18AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 08:18:16AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 20:35:01 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi all,
> > 
> > mm/truncate.c:612: error: implicit declaration of function 'inode_dio_wait'
> > 
> > mm/truncate.c should be #include-ing <linux/fs.h> for that function's
> > prototype, but that doesn't help when CONFIG_BLOCK is not enabled,
> > which is the case in this build failure.
> 
> Oops.  Two choices here:
> 
>  a) stub it out for non-blocks.
>  b) move it out of directio.c so that it's always provided.
> 
> I'd be fine with either one.  Al, any preferences?

None...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/