linux-kernel - Re: Nanosecond fs timestamp support: sad

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 22 Jul 2011 16:11:42 -0500
From:	Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc:	NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Nanosecond fs timestamp support: sad

On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 22:59 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Indeed. Only usefully exists on ext4 and requires extra system calls.
> 
> Not sure what you mean?  It's in stat(2), just like the timestamps.

I don't see anything that looks like a version or generation number in
either the man pages, the asm-generic/stat.h, or glibc's asm/stat.h.
Pointer?

The only interface I'm aware of is the EXT?_IOC_GETVERSION interface.
Looks like that is supported by BTRFS.

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/