linux-kernel - Re: block: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 26 Jul 2011 15:04:06 +0200
From:	Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>
To:	Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
CC:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: block: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000]
  code

On 2011-07-26 08:22, Ming Lei wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com> wrote:
>> On 2011-07-26 06:49, Ming Lei wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The bug is observed in -next-20110725, follows the stack trace[1], and
>>> seems the attachment patch can fix the bug.
>>
>> Does this work, too? We don't necessarily need the CPU stable, but
>> spewing debug output isn't very nice.
> 
> This does work, thanks,

Great, thanks for reporting and testing.

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/