linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] kconfig: Introduce KCONFIG(), KCONFIG_BUILTIN() and KCONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 27 Jul 2011 10:36:58 +0200
From:	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>
To:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
Cc:	Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@...il.com>,
	Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
	linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, sam@...nborg.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, plagnioj@...osoft.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] kconfig: Introduce KCONFIG(), KCONFIG_BUILTIN()
 and KCONFIG_MODULE()

On 27.7.2011 06:35, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 20:42:04 -0400 Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Arnaud Lacombe<lacombar@...il.com>  wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Randy Dunlap<rdunlap@...otime.net>  wrote:
>>>> I guess I prefer your ENABLED() syntax then.
>>>>
>>> we need to be careful about namespace pollution/collision.
>>>
>> For the sake of having numbers:
>>
>> % git grep -w ENABLED . | wc -l
>>      116
>> % git grep -w CONFIGURED . | wc -l
>>       11
>> % git grep -w KCONFIG . | wc -l
>>        1
>
> OK.  Then I would go back to a predicate like the original patch had,
> e.g.:
> 	IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA)

Good idea. Is anyone against
IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FOO)
IS_ENABLED_BUILTIN(CONFIG_FOO)
IS_ENABLED_MODULE(CONFIG_FOO)
?

Michal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/