lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 27 Jul 2011 18:04:05 +0800
From:	Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
CC:	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11] KVM: MMU: do not mark access bit on pte write path

On 07/27/2011 05:08 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 07/26/2011 02:28 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>> In current code, the accessed bit is always set when page fault occurred,
>> do not need to set it on pte write path
>>
> 
> Is this true? a write with pte.w=pte.a=0 sets pte.a?
> 

Generally, we will call set_spte() with speculative = false, then Accessed bit
is set on page fault path, but there has two case:
- if pte.d = 1, everything is ok
- if pte.d = 0, so this write can change pte.d = 1, the access permission of
  shadow page can be changed from read-only to writable. So, we will find a
  new sp to establish the mapping. In this case, the original spte is not
  set Accessed bit.

However, we used Accessed bit to detect write flooding, so the first write can
set the dirty bit, and the later write can not cause sp changed. I think it is
not too bad.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ