linux-kernel - Re: [RFC/PULL 00/11] introduce export.h; reduce module.h usage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 28 Jul 2011 06:19:24 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
Cc:	mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PULL 00/11] introduce export.h; reduce module.h usage

On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Paul Gortmaker
<paul.gortmaker@...driver.com> wrote:
>
> For all 160 commits, the branch "module.h-split", available here:
>
>        git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulg/linux.git
>
> has the complete content.  I've put the header changes after all the
> patches from the top 5 categories, so that people bisecting non related
> issues at a later date don't get hit with a commit zone with build failures.

Ok, sounds good. Two questions:

 - how much testing (randconfig? different architectures?) has this gotten?

 - how much does this actually improve compile times (for a "normal"
build or a "allmodconfig" one)?

It certainly sounds like the RightThing(tm) to do, but I'd like to
know that there is real actual improvements to build times and that
the pain won't be too bad...

             Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/