| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 11:42:29 -0400 From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com> To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> CC: <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [RFC/PULL 00/11] introduce export.h; reduce module.h usage [Re: [RFC/PULL 00/11] introduce export.h; reduce module.h usage] On 28/07/2011 (Thu 09:15) Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com> wrote: > > > I don't think there really is any rocket science or contentious > > stuff here. It is a sensible cleanup that adds organization and > > speeds up compiles. The RFC I'm hoping for is more about how/when > > we want to get this in tree. > > I'd suggest to stick it into linux-next ASAP, leave there for a few > days and after fixing any potential fallout send it Linuswards. Hi Stephen, Would you please add this to linux-next? git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulg/linux.git#module.h-split It won't need to be there forever, just long enough to shake loose anyone who has implicitly been using module.h without asking for it. Thanks, Paul. > > Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> > > Thanks, > > Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists