lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 11:51:31 +0300 From: Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com> To: walter harms <wharms@....de> Cc: Jean-François Dagenais <jeff.dagenais@...il.com>, Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] w1: off by one in w1_f29_remove_slave() On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 10:42:29AM +0200, walter harms wrote: > Is there any reason to release the data "backwards" ? > The default way is to go upwards. that looks more readable. I considered doing it that way. It would work. I throught maybe they were going to add something where it needed to be unwound LIFO order. I'll wait for Jean-Françoisto say which way is prefered. regards, dan carpenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists