linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next] regulator: aat2870-regulator.c needs module.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 1 Aug 2011 01:15:24 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	akpm <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] regulator: aat2870-regulator.c needs module.h

On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 09:13:09PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
> 
> aat2870-regulator.c needs to include linux/module.h to fix multiple
> build errors.

Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>

but if the breakage isn't in mainline yet to minimize the breaks
bisection someone should figure out which tree introduced the change
with module.h and either get the fix merged along with that.  If neither
the module.h change nor the driver is in Linus' tree yet I rather
suspect this should go via MFD as I seem to recall that the driver is
going in via there.

It's not entirely clear to me why this started showing up part way
through the merge window :/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/