linux-kernel - Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.0-rt6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 01 Aug 2011 12:34:02 +0200
From:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To:	Rolando Martins <rolando.martins@...il.com>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.0-rt6

On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 09:42 +0100, Rolando Martins wrote:
> Hi Peter,
> is there any progress on the CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED front?

Out of curiosity, why would you want that in a -rt kernel?

(I haven't done any PI testing with that, but I can imagine the throttle
causing heartburn)

	-Mike

> I don't know if this is related, but in 33-rt if I used a low (=100)
> cpu_runtime_us and cpu_period_us then I would get some freezes
> (something that does not happen in 2.6.39).

(providing a realtime budget of 100 whole microseconds to a kernel where
everything and it's brother is realtime is unlikely to go well)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/