| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 22:47:19 +0100 From: Julie Sullivan <kernelmail.jms@...il.com> To: Shashidhar Hiremath <shashidharh@...avyalabs.com> Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: A question on selection of source tree for patch submission > For the Kernel patch submission, Should I clone the source from > mainline or the linux-next tree ? You mean for generally submitting or testing patches? I'd clone mainline git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git and then remote track linux-next (or any other branch a specific maintainer would want you to test against, this depends on what your patch is for). Cheers Julie -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists