| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 20:53:26 -0700
From: Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
To: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Bharata B Rao <bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@...il.com>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>,
Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>, rth@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFT][patch 17/18] sched: use jump labels to reduce overhead when
bandwidth control is inactive
< snip>
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> Ok, I think I finally tracked this down. It may seem a bit crazy, but
> when we are getting down to cycle counting like this, it seems that the
> link order in the kernel/Makefile can make difference. I had the
> jump_label.o listed after the core files, whereas all the code in
> jump_label.o is really slow path code (used when toggling branch
> values). As follows:
>
>
> --- a/kernel/Makefile
> +++ b/kernel/Makefile
> @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ obj-y = sched.o fork.o exec_domain.o panic.o printk.o \
> kthread.o wait.o kfifo.o sys_ni.o posix-cpu-timers.o mutex.o \
> hrtimer.o rwsem.o nsproxy.o srcu.o semaphore.o \
> notifier.o ksysfs.o pm_qos_params.o sched_clock.o cred.o \
> - async.o range.o jump_label.o
> + async.o range.o
> obj-y += groups.o
>
> ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER
> @@ -107,6 +107,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS) += events/
> obj-$(CONFIG_USER_RETURN_NOTIFIER) += user-return-notifier.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PADATA) += padata.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP) += crash_dump.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL) += jump_label.o
>
> ifneq ($(CONFIG_SCHED_OMIT_FRAME_POINTER),y)
> # According to Alan Modra <alan@...uxcare.com.au>, the -fno-omit-frame-pointer is
>
>
> I've tested the patch using a single 'static_branch()' in the getppid() path,
> and basically running tight loops of calls to getppid(). Before, the
> patch, I was seeing results similar to what you reported, after the
> patch, things improved for all metrics. Here are my results for the
> branch disabled case:
>
> With jump labels turned on (CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL), branch disabled:
>
> Performance counter stats for 'bash -c /tmp/timing;true' (50 runs):
>
> 3,969,510,217 instructions # 0.864 IPC ( +-0.000% )
> 4,592,334,954 cycles ( +- 0.046% )
> 751,634,470 branches ( +- 0.000% )
>
> 1.722635797 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.046% )
>
> Jump labels turned off (CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL not set), branch disabled:
>
> Performance counter stats for 'bash -c /tmp/timing;true' (50 runs):
>
> 4,009,611,846 instructions # 0.867 IPC ( +-0.000% )
> 4,622,210,580 cycles ( +- 0.012% )
> 771,662,904 branches ( +- 0.000% )
>
> 1.734341454 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.022% )
>
>
> So all of the measured metrics improved in the jump labels case b/w
> 0.5% - 2.5%.
>
> I'm curious to see what you find with this patch.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Jason
>
Hi Jason,
Thanks for taking a look at this. Sorry, this took a few days to
benchmark all the permutations and we had some issues with internal
proxies which interrupted benchmarking runs.
Results and some analysis follow.
[
Key:
npo_XXX = with CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL, without link order patch (no patched order)
po_XXX = with CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL, with link order patch (patched order)
nojl_XXX = without CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL
Where "XXX" is
head: tip (c5bafb3) without patch series
cfs: tip + patch series - jump_label patch
cfs_jl: tip + patch series + jump_label for unconstrained
Test was repeated 3 times, each run was 50 repeats w/ typically ~<0.1
in-test variance on reported output
]
Considering just jump labels in tip, comparing against HEAD w/
!CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL
instructions cycles
branches elapsed
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Westmere:
njl_head.1 798832892 722624737
145375836 0.203218936 [baseline]
njl_head.2 798888783 (+0.01) 746118188 (+3.25)
145386807 (+0.01) 0.208573683 (-2.18)
njl_head.3 798864253 (+0.00) 731537139 (+1.23)
145382747 (+0.00) 0.204098175 (-4.28)
npo_head.1 797033521 (-0.23) 731239359 (+1.19)
144571358 (-0.55) 0.206910496 (-2.96)
npo_head.2 797166434 (-0.21) 728926020 (+0.87)
144603465 (-0.53) 0.202906392 (-4.84)
npo_head.3 797165370 (-0.21) 725930458 (+0.46)
144603438 (-0.53) 0.202118274 (-5.21)
po_head.1 797019904 (-0.23) 699008145 (-3.27)
144567652 (-0.56) 0.197272615 (-7.48)
po_head.2 797037682 (-0.22) 705732419 (-2.34)
144572115 (-0.55) 0.197101692 (-7.56)
po_head.3 797079804 (-0.22) 698007668 (-3.41)
144580964 (-0.55) 0.194871253 (-8.61)
Barcelona:
njl_head.1 816842028 748362637
147462095 0.341654152
njl_head.2 816849735 (+0.00) 748480742 (+0.02)
147462652 (+0.00) 0.341450734 (-2.90)
njl_head.3 816834963 (-0.00) 747083797 (-0.17)
147460200 (-0.00) 0.340802353 (-3.09)
npo_head.1 815068563 (-0.22) 775012690 (+3.56)
146661357 (-0.54) 0.353797321 (+0.61)
npo_head.2 815033261 (-0.22) 759613364 (+1.50)
146654106 (-0.55) 0.346462671 (-1.48)
npo_head.3 815029611 (-0.22) 762660196 (+1.91)
146654169 (-0.55) 0.347565129 (-1.16)
po_head.1 815026489 (-0.22) 767229109 (+2.52)
146653376 (-0.55) 0.350241833 (-0.40)
po_head.2 815035127 (-0.22) 770224495 (+2.92)
146654019 (-0.55) 0.351352092 (-0.09)
po_head.3 815109904 (-0.21) 774954096 (+3.55)
146662020 (-0.54) 0.353505054 (+0.53)
With the patch to fix link-order we're typically faster and it's
probably time to modulate the configs so we get CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL by
default when CC_HAS_ASM_GOTO.
Considering Bandwidth control, comparing vs HEAD w/ CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL:
instructions cycles
branches elapsed
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Westmere:
po_head.1 797019904 699008145
144567652 0.197272615 [Baseline]
po_head.2 797037682 (+0.00) 705732419 (+0.96)
144572115 (+0.00) 0.197101692 (-4.91)
po_head.3 797079804 (+0.01) 698007668 (-0.14)
144580964 (+0.01) 0.194871253 (-5.98)
njl_cfs.1 802649718 (+0.71) 708143552 (+1.31)
146577437 (+1.39) 0.198770168 (-4.10)
njl_cfs.2 802679078 (+0.71) 707486608 (+1.21)
146582628 (+1.39) 0.197890812 (-4.53)
njl_cfs.3 802647500 (+0.71) 704770712 (+0.82)
146578141 (+1.39) 0.196742304 (-5.08)
npo_cfs.1 800661523 (+0.46) 724068093 (+3.59)
145774786 (+0.83) 0.204632700 (-1.27)
npo_cfs.2 800646997 (+0.46) 718884486 (+2.84)
145772293 (+0.83) 0.201248482 (-2.91)
npo_cfs.3 800783171 (+0.47) 725140326 (+3.74)
145804350 (+0.86) 0.203266025 (-1.93)
npo_cfs_jl.1 797304605 (+0.04) 687741762 (-1.61)
143666256 (-0.62) 0.194302293 (-6.26)
npo_cfs_jl.2 797446281 (+0.05) 694066715 (-0.71)
143700065 (-0.60) 0.194212118 (-6.30)
npo_cfs_jl.3 797374495 (+0.04) 697561774 (-0.21)
143682692 (-0.61) 0.194935111 (-5.95)
po_cfs.1 800631004 (+0.45) 715819643 (+2.41)
145769677 (+0.83) 0.200007036 (-3.51)
po_cfs.2 800642622 (+0.45) 698569729 (-0.06)
145769973 (+0.83) 0.194625680 (-6.10)
po_cfs.3 800752778 (+0.47) 707282749 (+1.18)
145798992 (+0.85) 0.197047366 (-4.93)
po_cfs_jl.1 797306617 (+0.04) 686329256 (-1.81)
143666659 (-0.62) 0.193107369 (-6.83)
po_cfs_jl.2 797434478 (+0.05) 677865445 (-3.02)
143697712 (-0.60) 0.189314824 (-8.66)
po_cfs_jl.3 797299055 (+0.04) 686371679 (-1.81)
143665758 (-0.62) 0.191859014 (-7.44)
Barcelona:
po_head.1 815026489 767229109
146653376 0.350241833 [Baseline]
po_head.2 815035127 (+0.00) 770224495 (+0.39)
146654019 (+0.00) 0.351352092 (-2.47)
po_head.3 815109904 (+0.01) 774954096 (+1.01)
146662020 (+0.01) 0.353505054 (-1.87)
njl_cfs.1 820647075 (+0.69) 756895773 (-1.35)
148663929 (+1.37) 0.345563962 (-4.07)
njl_cfs.2 820672501 (+0.69) 761520373 (-0.74)
148667815 (+1.37) 0.347529253 (-3.53)
njl_cfs.3 820664350 (+0.69) 763400895 (-0.50)
148666126 (+1.37) 0.348337223 (-3.30)
npo_cfs.1 818629349 (+0.44) 758306455 (-1.16)
147854452 (+0.82) 0.346678486 (-3.77)
npo_cfs.2 818829256 (+0.47) 768393448 (+0.15)
147891099 (+0.84) 0.350678075 (-2.65)
npo_cfs.3 818697806 (+0.45) 772218715 (+0.65)
147866720 (+0.83) 0.352333672 (-2.20)
npo_cfs_jl.1 815343935 (+0.04) 760127157 (-0.93)
145753233 (-0.61) 0.347184970 (-3.62)
npo_cfs_jl.2 815415786 (+0.05) 775772068 (+1.11)
145762961 (-0.61) 0.353965833 (-1.74)
npo_cfs_jl.3 815403187 (+0.05) 764048918 (-0.41)
145761012 (-0.61) 0.348619922 (-3.23)
po_cfs.1 819204964 (+0.51) 767156385 (-0.01)
147959727 (+0.89) 0.350737982 (-2.64)
po_cfs.2 818665676 (+0.45) 764324366 (-0.38)
147860788 (+0.82) 0.348814489 (-3.17)
po_cfs.3 818661849 (+0.45) 752288492 (-1.95)
147859717 (+0.82) 0.343294319 (-4.70)
po_cfs_jl.1 815336908 (+0.04) 765760248 (-0.19)
145755155 (-0.61) 0.349608614 (-2.95)
po_cfs_jl.2 815322295 (+0.04) 765613685 (-0.21)
145751972 (-0.61) 0.349321663 (-3.03)
po_cfs_jl.3 815310833 (+0.03) 759647967 (-0.99)
145750118 (-0.62) 0.346607639 (-3.78)
Thanks to the magic of compiler re-organization we now report zero
overhead, in fact a speed-up is realized.
I will re-post v7.3 with:
- rebase to minor changes in tip
- removing RFT from adding jump_labels to CFS
- additional hierarchical period constraint
Thanks for looking into this Jason!
- Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists