linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH]vhost-blk: In-kernel accelerator for virtio block device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 05 Aug 2011 15:56:41 +0800
From:	Liu Yuan <namei.unix@...il.com>
To:	Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@...ibm.com>
CC:	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...il.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Khoa Huynh <khoa@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH]vhost-blk: In-kernel accelerator for virtio block
 device

On 08/05/2011 05:58 AM, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> Hi Liu Yuan,
>
> I started testing your patches. I applied your kernel patch to 3.0
> and applied QEMU to latest git.
>
> I passed 6 blockdevices from the host to guest (4 vcpu, 4GB RAM).
> I ran simple "dd" read tests from the guest on all block devices
> (with various blocksizes, iflag=direct).
>
> Unfortunately, system doesn't stay up. I immediately get into
> panic on the host. I didn't get time to debug the problem. Wondering
> if you have seen this issue before and/or you have new patchset
> to try ?
>
> Let me know.
>

This patch set doesn't support multiple devices currently, since 
vhost-blk code for the qemu just
passes *one* backend to the vhost_blk module in the kernel.

If you really need to test it with multiple blockdevices, you have to 
tweak vhost-blk part for qemu.

I'll take a look at this issue, but not a promise with a patch as soon 
as possible.

Yuan

> Thanks,
> Badari
>
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:3059!
> invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
> CPU 7
> Modules linked in: vhost_blk ebtable_nat ebtables xt_CHECKSUM bridge stp llc autofs4 sunrpc cpufreq_ondemand acpi_cpufreq freq_table mperf cachefiles fscache ipt_REJECT ip6t_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 xt_state nf_conntrack ip6table_filter ip6_tables ipv6 dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_round_robin scsi_dh_rdac dm_multipath vhost_net macvtap macvlan tun kvm_intel kvm cdc_ether usbnet mii microcode serio_raw pcspkr i2c_i801 i2c_core iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support shpchp ioatdma dca i7core_edac edac_core bnx2 sg ext4 mbcache jbd2 sd_mod crc_t10dif qla2xxx scsi_transport_fc scsi_tgt mptsas mptscsih mptbase scsi_transport_sas dm_mod [last unloaded: nf_defrag_ipv4]
>
> Pid: 2744, comm: vhost-2698 Not tainted 3.0.0 #2 IBM  -[7870AC1]-/46M0761
> RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8114932c>]  [<ffffffff8114932c>] cache_alloc_refill+0x22c/0x250
> RSP: 0018:ffff880258c87d00  EFLAGS: 00010046
> RAX: 0000000000000002 RBX: ffff88027f800040 RCX: dead000000200200
> RDX: ffff880271128000 RSI: 0000000000000070 RDI: ffff88026eb6c000
> RBP: ffff880258c87d50 R08: ffff880271128000 R09: 0000000000000003
> R10: 000000021fffffff R11: ffff88026b5790c0 R12: ffff880272cd8c00
> R13: ffff88027f822440 R14: 0000000000000002 R15: ffff88026eb6c000
> FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88027fce0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
> CR2: 0000000000ecb100 CR3: 0000000270bfe000 CR4: 00000000000026e0
> DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> Process vhost-2698 (pid: 2744, threadinfo ffff880258c86000, task ffff8802703154c0)
> Stack:
>   ffff880200000002 000492d000000000 ffff88027f822460 ffff88027f822450
>   ffff880258c87d60 ffff88027f800040 0000000000000000 00000000000080d0
>   00000000000080d0 0000000000000246 ffff880258c87da0 ffffffff81149c82
> Call Trace:
>   [<ffffffff81149c82>] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x182/0x190
>   [<ffffffffa0252f52>] handle_guest_kick+0x162/0x799 [vhost_blk]
>   [<ffffffffa02514ab>] vhost_worker+0xcb/0x150 [vhost_blk]
>   [<ffffffffa02513e0>] ? vhost_dev_set_owner+0x190/0x190 [vhost_blk]
>   [<ffffffffa02513e0>] ? vhost_dev_set_owner+0x190/0x190 [vhost_blk]
>   [<ffffffff81084c66>] kthread+0x96/0xa0
>   [<ffffffff814d2f84>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
>   [<ffffffff81084bd0>] ? kthread_worker_fn+0x1a0/0x1a0
>   [<ffffffff814d2f80>] ? gs_change+0x13/0x13
> Code: 48 89 df e8 07 fb ff ff 65 8b 14 25 58 dc 00 00 85 c0 48 63 d2 4c 8b 24 d3 74 16 41 83 3c 24 00 0f 84 fc fd ff ff e9 75 ff ff ff<0f>  0b 66 90 eb fc 31 c0 41 83 3c 24 00 0f 85 62 ff ff ff 90 e9
> RIP  [<ffffffff8114932c>] cache_alloc_refill+0x22c/0x250
>   RSP<ffff880258c87d00>
> ---[ end trace e286566e512cba7b ]---
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/