[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 09:11:52 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: torvalds@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
autofs@...ux.kernel.org, Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] autofs4: Use no_printk() for no-op DPRINTK() and use
__VA_ARGS__ too
On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 16:10 +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Use no_printk() for autofs's no-op DPRINTK() to prevent unused statements from
> becoming accidentally obsolete, and use __VA_ARGS__ too as that's the standard
> way.
[]
> diff --git a/fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h b/fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h
> index 475f9c5..c3a419f 100644
> --- a/fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h
> +++ b/fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h
> @@ -40,13 +40,17 @@
> /* #define DEBUG */
>
> #ifdef DEBUG
> -#define DPRINTK(fmt, args...) \
> +#define DPRINTK(fmt, ...) \
> do { \
> printk(KERN_DEBUG "pid %d: %s: " fmt "\n", \
> - current->pid, __func__, ##args); \
> + current->pid, __func__, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
> } while (0)
> #else
> -#define DPRINTK(fmt, args...) do {} while (0)
> +#define DPRINTK(fmt, ...) \
> +do { \
> + no_printk(KERN_DEBUG "pid %d: %s: " fmt "\n", \
> + current->pid, __func__, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
> +} while (0)
single statement macros don't need do {} while (0),
and this could be
#define DPRINTK(fmt, args...) \
pr_debug("pid %d: %s: " fmt "\n", \
current->pid, __func__, ##__VA_ARGS__)
When using dynamic debug __func__ and pid are unnecessary as
these can be added to any pr_debug output with '+f' and '+t'
so I think those should not be added either.
I think the DPRINTK macro should be removed altogether and
pr_debug should be used instead.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists