lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 08 Aug 2011 16:45:15 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@...omium.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Ramsay Jones <ramsay@...say1.demon.co.uk>,
	Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>,
	Joachim Eastwood <manabian@...il.com>,
	Andreas Schwab <schwab@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.hengli.com.au>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/sha1: remove memsets and allocate workspace on the
 stack

On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 16:07 -0700, Mandeep Singh Baines wrote:
> The previous implementation required the workspace to be passed in as
> a parameter. This prevents the compiler from being able to store the
> workspace in registers. I've also removed the memset since that also
> prevents the compiler from storing the workspace in registers.

I did a similar patch locally.

> There is no loss of security due to removing the memset. It would be a
> bug for the stack to leak to userspace. However, a defence-in-depth
> argument could be made for keeping the clearing of the workspace.

You should add #include <linux/crypthash.h> to
lib/sha1.c and perhaps rationalize the use of __u8
and char for the second argument to sha_transform in
the definition and uses.

For defense in depth, a bool could be added to sha_transform
like:

void sha_transform(__u32 *digest, const char *data, bool wipe);

and the internal workspace memset after use if wipe set though
perhaps the memset could be a compile time option like
CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEFENSE_IN_DEPTH or such instead.

> diff --git a/drivers/char/random.c b/drivers/char/random.c
[]
> @@ -816,13 +816,13 @@ static size_t account(struct entropy_store *r, size_t nbytes, int min,
>  static void extract_buf(struct entropy_store *r, __u8 *out)
[]
> -		sha_transform(hash, (__u8 *)(r->pool + i), workspace);
> +		sha_transform(hash, (__u8 *)(r->pool + i));
[]
> diff --git a/include/linux/cryptohash.h b/include/linux/cryptohash.h
[]
> @@ -3,10 +3,9 @@
[]
> -void sha_transform(__u32 *digest, const char *data, __u32 *W);
> +void sha_transform(__u32 *digest, const char *data);
[]
> diff --git a/lib/sha1.c b/lib/sha1.c
[]
> +void sha_transform(__u32 *digest, const char *data)
[]
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/syncookies.c b/net/ipv4/syncookies.c
[]
> @@ -50,7 +49,7 @@ static u32 cookie_hash(__be32 saddr, __be32 daddr, __be16 sport, __be16 dport,
[]
> -	sha_transform(tmp + 16, (__u8 *)tmp, tmp + 16 + 5);
> +	sha_transform(tmp + 16, (__u8 *)tmp);
[]
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
[]
> @@ -2511,8 +2510,7 @@ struct sk_buff *tcp_make_synack(struct sock *sk, struct dst_entry *dst,
[]
>  			sha_transform((__u32 *)&xvp->cookie_bakery[0],
> -				      (char *)mess,
> -				      &workspace[0]);
> +				      (char *)mess);
[]
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/syncookies.c b/net/ipv6/syncookies.c
[]
> @@ -81,7 +80,7 @@ static u32 cookie_hash(const struct in6_addr *saddr, const struct in6_addr *dadd
[]
> -	sha_transform(tmp + 16, (__u8 *)tmp, tmp + 16 + 5);
> +	sha_transform(tmp + 16, (__u8 *)tmp);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ