linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 12/41] microblaze: Don't reimplement force

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 17 Aug 2011 14:25:25 +0100
From:	Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
To:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc:	Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/41] microblaze: Don't reimplement force_sigsegv()

On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 15:14 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> 
> Assuming the changelog is fixed,
> 
> 	Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>

Thanks!

> > If you want to propose 12-15 through my Microblaze tree, please let me know.
> 
> Probably this is the best option. Matt, what do you think?

Yeah, that seems like the best solution. All of the patches are
independent so it's easy for the respective maintainers to apply them
when they're ready.

I'll be sending out updated versions today.

-- 
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/