linux-kernel - Re: pstore: change mutex locking to spin

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 17 Aug 2011 23:47:59 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: pstore: change mutex locking to spin_locks

On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 14:22 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> It's still bad if lockdep is enabled.  See
> kernel/lockdep.c:lock_acquire() and lock_release().  They aren't
> NMI-safe. 

Good thing nmi_enter() does lockdep_disable() and makes lock_acquire()
bail on if (current->lockdep_recursion).

Still the fact that pstore needs locks from NMI context (let alone tried
to use a mutex) makes one think one should avoid it like the plague.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/