linux-kernel - Re: + prctl-add-pr_setget_child_reaper-to-allow-simple-process-supervision .patch added to -mm tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 18 Aug 2011 16:25:08 +0200
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Lennart Poettering <mzxreary@...inter.de>
Cc:	Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-man@...r.kernel.org,
	roland@...k.frob.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: +
	prctl-add-pr_setget_child_reaper-to-allow-simple-process-supervision
	.patch added to -mm tree

On 08/18, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
> On Wed, 17.08.11 15:45, Oleg Nesterov (oleg@...hat.com) wrote:
>
> > You should mark the whole process as sub-reaper, not a single thread
> > which does prctl(). The parent/child relationship is process-wide.
>
> Hmm, how would we implement this best? Would it be sufficient to follow
> group_leader pointer to set/get the flag,

You can mark task->group_leader. Or, probably better, task->signal.

INHO, the best option is SIGNAL_SUB_REAPER in signal->flags. But this
is not possible until we cleanup the usage of signal->flags.

> and to follow real_parent

OOPS. I simly can't understand how I managed to miss this. Of course,
in any case you should follow ->real_parent, not ->parent!

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/