lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 19 Aug 2011 17:46:23 +0100
From:	Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
To:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 07/43] blackfin: Use set_current_blocked() and block_sigmask()

From: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...ux.intel.com>

As described in e6fa16ab ("signal: sigprocmask() should do
retarget_shared_pending()") the modification of current->blocked is
incorrect as we need to check whether the signal we're about to block
is pending in the shared queue.

Also, use the new helper function block_sigmask() which centralises
the code for updating current->blocked after successfully delivering a
signal and reduces the amount of duplicate code across
architectures. In the past some architectures got this code wrong, so
using this helper function should stop that from happening again.

Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...ux.intel.com>
---

v2 of this patch depends on "[PATCH 01/43] signal: Add block_sigmask()
for adding sigmask to current->blocked" so they need to go through the
same tree but this patch would benefit from some maintainer ACK's.

 arch/blackfin/kernel/signal.c |   17 ++++-------------
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/blackfin/kernel/signal.c b/arch/blackfin/kernel/signal.c
index d536f35..05ece02 100644
--- a/arch/blackfin/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/arch/blackfin/kernel/signal.c
@@ -99,10 +99,7 @@ asmlinkage int do_rt_sigreturn(unsigned long __unused)
 		goto badframe;
 
 	sigdelsetmask(&set, ~_BLOCKABLE);
-	spin_lock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
-	current->blocked = set;
-	recalc_sigpending();
-	spin_unlock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
+	set_current_blocked(&set);
 
 	if (rt_restore_sigcontext(regs, &frame->uc.uc_mcontext, &r0))
 		goto badframe;
@@ -266,15 +263,9 @@ handle_signal(int sig, siginfo_t *info, struct k_sigaction *ka,
 	/* set up the stack frame */
 	ret = setup_rt_frame(sig, ka, info, oldset, regs);
 
-	if (ret == 0) {
-		spin_lock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
-		sigorsets(&current->blocked, &current->blocked,
-			  &ka->sa.sa_mask);
-		if (!(ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_NODEFER))
-			sigaddset(&current->blocked, sig);
-		recalc_sigpending();
-		spin_unlock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
-	}
+	if (ret == 0)
+		block_sigmask(ka, sig);
+
 	return ret;
 }
 
-- 
1.7.4.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ