lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 21 Aug 2011 19:56:17 +0200
From:	Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
CC:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] block bits for 3.1-rc

On 2011-08-20 19:41, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 03:16:40PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> - Revert of the CFQ meta data special treatment patch, it's been shown
>>   to regress a kernel build workload by about 10%. More investigation
>>   is needed, for 3.1 lets just back it out.
> 
> Sorry, but you can't simply do that without any coordination.  We have
> added that marker to xfs now that the stupid special casing stopped,
> and turning it back on will cause us massive slowdows.  Next time
> please better coordinate this with its users.  In fact I have never
> seen this patch or a discussion on any mailinglist.

The discussion was on lkml, as Mike points out. But yes, short time to
react. Since I can't easily cater to both cases right now, how about we
add a temporary second meta flag that is only used for tracing?

        REQ_META        = (__REQ_META | __REQ_META_TRACE),
        RET_META_TRACE  = __REQ_META_TRACE,

You get the idea. Not super pretty, but it should solve the immediate
issue.

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ