linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Add a personality to report 2.6.x version numbers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 22 Aug 2011 12:03:36 -0700
From:	David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add a personality to report 2.6.x version numbers

On 08/22/2011 11:45 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le lundi 22 août 2011 à 11:30 -0700, Linus Torvalds a écrit :
>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Andi Kleen<andi@...stfloor.org>  wrote:
>>>
>>> Reposting due to popular demand. Several other people are running
>>> into the same problem with all kinds of software.
>>
>> I have heard this several times now, but nobody actually ever says
>> *what* is broken.
>>
>> The Fedora people seem to have done the 2.6.40 thing without any
>> actual reason, for example (the two programs they claim were broken
>> were things that they had already fixed in rawhide, afaik).
>>
>> I'm not at all interested in these kinds of "all kinds of software" reports.
>>
>> Details. Examples. Name the f&*cking names already. Shame them publicly.
>
> For example, all kind of management software from HP doesnt work, unless
> we pretend to run a 2.6 kernel.
>
> $ uname -a
> Linux svivoipvnx001 3.0.0-08107-g97cd98f #1062 SMP Fri Aug 12 18:11:45
> CEST 2011 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
>
> $ hpacucli ctrl all show
>
> Error: No controllers detected.
>

Perhaps the 3.x version change patch should be reverted on the 
never-ever-break-userspace grounds. :-)  It would appear that the 2.6 
version information has become a de facto part of the kernel's ABI.

David Daney
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/