linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/19] GPIO exodus and cleanup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 22 Aug 2011 10:24:59 +0100
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@...ionengravers.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/19] GPIO exodus and cleanup

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 09:27:00AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 09:53:48AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 5:45 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
> > >> Ping on this, on monday I'll pretend it's no big deal and pour them
> > >> into Russells patch tracker anyway, since he's managing more than
> > >> half of the kernels GPIO code in arch/arm/* anyway.
> > >
> > > If Russell is okay with it, then go ahead and merge it.  I'm being
> > > pretty liberal about GPIO driver moves.  I'm fine with them getting
> > > cleaned up after the drivers/gpio move.
> > 
> > Okay! Russell I've put them into your patch tracker as patches
> > 7032/1 thru 7050/1 so you can pick and choose. I've rebased on
> > top of what's in -next hoping that the stuff there affecting these
> > file will mainly be identical to what's on your "gpio" branch.
> > 
> > Tell me if I should rebase on something specific or if there are
> > any problems.
> 
> I've applied as many as I can, but 7042/1, 7046/1, 7047/1 and 7048/1
> failed:
> 
> Patching 7042/1...
> git apply --whitespace=fix -p1 --index --check > /tmp/pdb.26923 2>&1 exited with non-zero status: 256
> error: patch failed: drivers/gpio/gpio-ep93xx.c:24
> error: drivers/gpio/gpio-ep93xx.c: patch does not apply
> Patching 7046/1...
> git apply --whitespace=fix -p1 --index --check > /tmp/pdb.26923 2>&1 exited with non-zero status: 256
> error: patch failed: arch/arm/mach-mmp/gplugd.c:9
> error: arch/arm/mach-mmp/gplugd.c: patch does not apply
> error: drivers/gpio/gpio-pxa.c: does not exist in index
> Patching 7047/1...
> git apply --whitespace=fix -p1 --index --check > /tmp/pdb.26923 2>&1 exited with non-zero status: 256
> error: patch failed: drivers/gpio/Makefile:40
> error: drivers/gpio/Makefile: patch does not apply
> Patching 7048/1...
> git apply --whitespace=fix -p1 --index --check > /tmp/pdb.26923 2>&1 exited with non-zero status: 256
> error: drivers/gpio/gpio-pnx4008.c: does not exist in index
> 
> It looks like there are changes to these in other trees which conflict.

Looking through the gpio.h files, plat-nomadik's is virtually empty
except for a copyright, ifdef and include of linux/kernel.h - can it
be killed off entirely now?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/