linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] nohz: Drop useless call in tick_nohz_start

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 23 Aug 2011 18:50:44 +0200
From:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] nohz: Drop useless call in tick_nohz_start_idle()

Ping? No problem with these three patches?

On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 08:49:36PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> The call to update_ts_time_stats() there is useless. All
> we need is to save the idle entry_time.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> ---
>  kernel/time/tick-sched.c |    3 ---
>  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> index d5097c4..58e1a96 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> @@ -185,9 +185,6 @@ static ktime_t tick_nohz_start_idle(int cpu, struct tick_sched *ts)
>  	ktime_t now;
>  
>  	now = ktime_get();
> -
> -	update_ts_time_stats(cpu, ts, now, NULL);
> -
>  	ts->idle_entrytime = now;
>  	ts->idle_active = 1;
>  	sched_clock_idle_sleep_event();
> -- 
> 1.7.5.4
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/