linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 13/15] x86: add cmpxchg

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 23 Aug 2011 13:45:08 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
CC:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/15] x86: add cmpxchg_flag() variant

On 08/23/2011 12:53 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> 
> Yes, that would ideal.  The closest you can get is asm goto(), but the
> syntax for that would be awful; something like:
> 
> #define cmpxchg_jump(ptr, old, new, fail)\
> 	asm goto (...)
> 
> 
> :
> :
> 
> again:
> 	old = *thingp;
> 	new = frobulate(old);
> 	cmpxchg_jump(thingp, old, new, again);
> 	/* worked */
> 
> Would this be useful enough?
> 

Actually there is a trick:

static inline bool ....
{
	asm goto(... yes);
no:
	return false;
yes:
	return true;
}

... which makes syntax a heckuva lot less awkward.

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/