linux-kernel - Re: [Patch] numa: introduce CONFIG_NUMA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 25 Aug 2011 18:22:00 +0800
From:	Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
To:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
CC:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, gregkh@...e.de,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [Patch] numa: introduce CONFIG_NUMA_SYSFS for drivers/base/node.c

于 2011年08月25日 13:04, David Rientjes 写道:
> On Wed, 24 Aug 2011, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
>>> Below is the updated version.
>>>
>>> Thanks for testing!
>>
>> Yes, that works after changing #ifdef defined(...)
>> to #if defined(...)
>>
>> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap<rdunlap@...otime.net>
>>
>
> No, it doesn't work, CONFIG_HUGETLBFS can be enabled with CONFIG_NUMA=y
> and CONFIG_SYSFS=n and that uses data structures from drivers/base/node.c
> which doesn't get compiled with this patch.

So, you mean with CONFIG_NUMA=y && CONFIG_SYSFS=n && CONFIG_HUGETLBFS=y
we still get compile error?

Which data structures are used by hugetlbfs?

Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/