linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dma: shdma: transfer based runtime PM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 25 Aug 2011 22:50:50 +0530
From:	"Koul, Vinod" <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To:	Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma: shdma: transfer based runtime PM

On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 16:55 +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Aug 2011, Koul, Vinod wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 16:37 +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > On Thu, 25 Aug 2011, Koul, Vinod wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 16:55 +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > > > Currently the shdma dmaengine driver uses runtime PM to save power, when
> > > > > no channel on the specific controller is requested by a user. This patch
> > > > > switches the driver to count individual DMA transfers. That way the
> > > > > controller can be powered down between transfers, even if some of its
> > > > > channels are in use.
> > > > No, I don't agree with the approach here, you don't need to count the
> > > > transfers, the runtime_pm framework does that very well for you.
> > > > 
> > > > What you need to do is to call pm_runtime_get() in your .issue_pending
> > > > callback (NOT in tx_submit anyway, this needs to be fixed in driver, see
> > > > the Documentation/dmaengine.txt
> > > > And once the transfer has completed you need to call pm_rumtime_put()
> > > 
> > > This has been discussed before:
> > > 
> > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-sh&m=131004613801231&w=2
> > uh, yes but at least the runtime_xxx needs to get fixed.
> 
> This isn't so easy either. In principle, yes, I know, that pm_runtime_* 
> calls count depth. But I don't think the DMA case is simple enough for 
> that. It's not necessarily one in - one out. Think about terminating 
> transfers, timing out, closing the channel, etc. In those cases you'd have 
> to count pending transfers and pm_runtime_put() for each of them. This is 
> even less trivial on shdma, where DMA transfers get split into sg-lists, 
> which are then all queued on a single queue. So, you'd have to scan that 
> queue and check for transfer borders... That's why I decided that doing 
> just one get() on the first descriptor and one put() on the last one would 
> be easier and more robust.
Wont it be easy to to do:
- pm_runtime_get() in each submit
- pm_runtime_put() in each callback
Normal case above would work just fine
- In terminate case, count the number of issued transactions, and call
pm_runtime_put() for each canceled transaction
(i am assuming that for each timeout error, the client will call
terminate)

Let me know if there is a case for you which doesn't fit in above

-- 
~Vinod

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/