linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xen tree with the tip tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 25 Aug 2011 11:26:37 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
CC:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Xen Devel <Xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xen tree with the tip tree

On 08/25/2011 11:13 AM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On 08/24/2011 09:24 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the xen tree got a conflict in
>> arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h between a series of commits from the tip
>> tree and a smaller series of similar commits from the xen tree.
>>
>> I see that Linus is commenting on these patches at the moment, and its
>> not easy to resolve the conflicts, so I will just use the xen tree from
>> next-20110824 for today.
>>
> 
> Thanks Stephen; the xen tree ones are more current, and I want to make
> sure I didn't screw up any of the cmpxchg/xadd changes in a wider test env.
> 

Stephen: the x86/spinlocks branch in the -tip tree is obsolete and
should be dropped.

	-hpa

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/