linux-kernel - Re: Approaches to making io

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 2 Sep 2011 09:10:57 -0400
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Daniel Ehrenberg <dehrenberg@...gle.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Approaches to making io_submit not block

On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 09:08:35AM -0400, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> That may be true for hard drives, but PCIe attached flash can support
> millions of IOP's per second --- i.e., at least hundreds of IOP's in
> milliseconds.  Yes, these devices are expensive, but so are the
> thousand-disk RAID arrays that some people attach via XFS.  :-)

reading / writing to the devices is different from allocator calls.

You reall do not want to do an allocator call for each of these device.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/