linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2 v3] Small cleanup of bdi_forker

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 3 Sep 2011 01:12:12 +0200
From:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:	Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>
Cc:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2 v3] Small cleanup of bdi_forker_thread()

On Fri 02-09-11 17:07:10, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 2011-09-02 16:54, Jan Kara wrote:
> > 
> >   Hi Jens,
> > 
> >   so after I realized how I underestimated subtlety of bdi_forker_thread()
> > here are two small cleanups to it. The first one puts clearing of BDI_pending
> > in a more natural place, the second patch adds a comment so that fools like
> > me don't try to optimize the function in a wrong place...
> 
> Thanks Jan, I've queued it up for 3.1. I've marked it as stable, looks
> like we need it from 2.6.36 and above.
  Thanks. But is it really a stable material? It's just a cleanup after
all...

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/