linux-kernel - Re: RFD: x32 ABI system call numbers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 03 Sep 2011 10:04:28 -0400
From:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Richard Kuo <rkuo@...eaurora.org>,
	Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>,
	Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>,
	Tobias Klauser <tklauser@...tanz.ch>
Subject: Re: RFD: x32 ABI system call numbers

On Sat, 03 Sep 2011 10:41:16 +0200, Arnd Bergmann said:

(Admittedly, I'm tuning in late on this discussion, but...)

> For the ioctl interface however, the __u64/__s64 type in the x32 ABI
> must be defined with __attribute__((packed,aligned(4))) to match what
> the kernel implements because it emulates the x86-32 ABI.

Is this a cast-in-stone issue, or is it still not too late to change that?
And if we change that, can we simplify anything?

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped