linux-kernel - Regmap bulk read styles.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 05 Sep 2011 15:49:14 +0100
From:	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@....ac.uk>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
CC:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Regmap bulk read styles.

Hi Mark,

I'm looking at the using your regmap stuff for IIO.
Other than the minor queries in the other emails I've sent,
the big issue for me is that of bulk reading.

The two most common forms we have are 'burst read'
and what might be termed a 'gather read'.

The burst read is pretty much what you have covered by
regmap_bulk_read. I assume an implementation for spi
doing

TX Addr1 XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX
RX XXXXX Data1 Data2 Data3 Data4 ...

would be general enough to be worth providing? Any device
that doesn't understand this should simply not use it.

The second is more interesting.  It actually looks quite like
your gather write.  We have a set of registers that we need
to read.  A classic example is that a coherent set will only
be received (e.g. valid at an instant in time) if we read
all channels of an accelerometer in one go (between chip selects).

typically involves either

TX  Addr1  Addr2  Addr3  XXXXX
RX  XXXXX  Data1  Data2  Data3

Or

TX Addr1  00000 Addr2 00000
RX XXXXX  Data1 XXXXX Data2

One slight complexity is cs_change, but that probably needs fixing
in the spi core which doesn't currently allowing setting up a
default for that.  This second case would be a set of transfers
(read then writes effectively).

Would you be in favour of an interface to handle this use case
or is it better just to bypass regmap for this use case?
(which would be a pity as it leads to duplication as all the
configuration stuff fits nicely).

As an aside, isn't your gather write more typically described
as a scatter write?  (writes one coherent set to a number of
disjoint locations?)

Alternatively should I just be bypassing regmap entirely for
read only data registers like these?  Caching is kind of pointless
other than for debugging purposes (though that would be nice).

Thanks,

Jonathan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/