linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/8] regmap: Introduce caching support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 5 Sep 2011 10:44:39 +0100
From:	Dimitris Papastamos <dp@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc:	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>,
	Graeme Gregory <gg@...mlogic.co.uk>,
	Samuel Oritz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] regmap: Introduce caching support

On Sat, Sep 03, 2011 at 12:48:27AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 10:02:02PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> > On 09/02/2011 05:46 PM, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
> 
> > > +static const struct regcache_ops *cache_types[] = {
> > > +};
> 
> > I wonder if it makes sense to keep a list of regcache_ops this way, or whether
> > it is not better to just pass the ops we want to use to regcache_init directly.
> 
> Or have a function per cache type.  I'm keen to hide the ops from users
> because I don't want to have to worry about them peering inside the
> internals.

Yes I guess I'll do that, sounds cleaner.

Thanks,
Dimitris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/