lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 9 Sep 2011 17:42:38 -0700
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>
Cc:	Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	Robert Jennings <rcj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Linux Driver Project <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] zram: Set initial disksize to some default value

On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 08:18:56PM -0400, Nitin Gupta wrote:
> On 09/09/2011 07:12 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 07:01:04PM -0400, Nitin Gupta wrote:
> >> Currently, we set initial disksize as 0, which forces
> >> user to write some value to corresponding zram device's
> >> sysfs node, before the device can be used. Now, we avoid
> >> this step by providing some default size initially.
> >>
> >> To change the disksize, user must:
> >>  - Reset disk.
> >> 	Ex: echo 1 > /sys/block/zram0/reset
> >> (NOTE: disksize is set to the default value after reset)
> >>
> >>  - Set new disksize.
> >> 	Ex: echo $((256*1024*1024)) > /sys/block/zram0/disksize
> > 
> > So, what tools just broke with this change?
> > 
> > And where is the sysfs file documentation change that should go along
> > with this?
> > 
> 
> 
> This change does not change any sysfs names or behavior, so does not
> break any scripts that assume the current behavior. I also verified that
> sysfs documentation (ABI/testing/sysfs-block-zram) need not be changed
> and same with drivers/staging/zram/zram.txt.

Huh, you just said the behavior changed as described in your comment
above.  You said the user no longer has to do a step to accomplish
something.  What happens if they do do that after this patch?

confused,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ