linux-kernel - Re: scheduling while atomic: swapper/0/0x10000002

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 12 Sep 2011 18:43:17 +0200
From:	Christian Hoffmann <email@...istianhoffmann.info>
To:	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
CC:	Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...il.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: scheduling while atomic: swapper/0/0x10000002

On 09/10/2011 09:58 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 07:17:53PM +0200, Christian Hoffmann wrote:
>> On 09/10/2011 06:44 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>> On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Christian Hoffmann
>>> <email@...istianhoffmann.info>   wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I can see the following bug report in the kernel 3.1 rc5 dmesg:
>>>>
>>>> [    0.000008] BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/0/0x10000002
>>>> [    0.000012] Modules linked in:
>>>> [    0.000015] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 3.1.0-rc5-ch+ #2
>>>> [    0.000017] Call Trace:
>>>> [    0.000024]  [<ffffffff81052cb6>] __schedule_bug+0x66/0x70
>>>> [    0.000028]  [<ffffffff8160329d>] schedule+0x99d/0x9b0
>>>> [    0.000032]  [<ffffffff81cf22b5>] ? pidmap_init+0x9f/0xdf
>>>> [    0.000035]  [<ffffffff8105cc7a>] __cond_resched+0x2a/0x40
>>>> [    0.000038]  [<ffffffff81603541>] _cond_resched+0x31/0x40
>>>> [    0.000041]  [<ffffffff8115fb63>] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x53/0x160
>>>> [    0.000043]  [<ffffffff81cf22b5>] pidmap_init+0x9f/0xdf
>>>> [    0.000046]  [<ffffffff81cd9b8a>] start_kernel+0x333/0x3c8
>>>> [    0.000049]  [<ffffffff81cd9347>] x86_64_start_reservations+0x132/0x136
>>>> [    0.000051]  [<ffffffff81cd944c>] x86_64_start_kernel+0x101/0x110
>>>
>>> Paul McKenney has a patch that solves this oops.  You can find it here:
>>>
>>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131537669921538&w=2
>>>
>>> We had discussed getting this into 3.1, but apparently that didn't
>>> happen (yet?).  I thought it had been sent upstream with my tested-by,
>>> but I don't see it included in Linus' tree.
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> the patch up there doesn't seem to apply cleanly to 3.1 rc5, as it
>> misses the rename done in "[PATCH tip/core/rcu 23/55] rcu: Simplify
>> quiescent-state accounting"
>> (http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131537654621392&w=2).
>
> For 3.1-rc5, you will be wanting this one:
>
> 	https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/19/355

Hi,

yes, this applies and makes the stack disappear.

Thanks,
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/