linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the tip tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 14 Sep 2011 17:43:30 +0800
From:	Shan Hai <haishan.bai@...il.com>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the tip tree

On 09/14/2011 05:37 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Sep 2011, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc allnoconfig)
>> produced this warning:
>>
>> lib/atomic64.c: In function 'lock_addr':
>> lib/atomic64.c:42:2: warning: return from incompatible pointer type
>>
>> Introduced by commit f59ca05871a0 ("locking, lib/atomic64: Annotate
>> atomic64_lock::lock as raw").  This function (which is declared to return
>> "spinlock_t *") is now returning "raw_spinlock_t *".
> My bad, it seems I picked the wrong version of the patch.

Hi Thomas,

Please pick the V4 patch, the last one which I have sent to you,
I am sorry for the subject line it indicates V3 :(

Thanks
Shan Hai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/