linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf: add support for disabling -Werror via WERROR=0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 15 Sep 2011 11:53:15 -0300
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
To:	Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: add support for disabling -Werror via WERROR=0

Em Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 01:42:39PM -0700, Darren Hart escreveu:
> GCC often introduces new warnings with lots of false positives - breaking
> -Werror builds. WERROR=0 allows one to build perf without much fuss - while
> still encouraging people to send patches to avoid the fuss of having to type
> WERROR=0.
> 
> Bisecting back to commits that produce a (mostly harmless) warning on some
> compilers is more difficult. With WERROR=0 one could bisect without worrying
> about harmless warnings.

Thanks, I put it in my perf/urgent branch in:

https://github.com/acmel/linux/commit/d8075f711858fce568e37453c1dd5e2b6f18504c

- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/