lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 09:37:20 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> To: Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de> Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/3] futex: Reduce hash bucket lock contention On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 14:57 +0200, Manfred Spraul wrote: > How do we verify that everything is able to deal with spurious > wakeups? > Well, I could go audit all 1400+ *schedule*() callsites in the kernel. Or we can rely on the fact that current code can already cause spurious wakeups due to signals. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists