linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 1/2] drivers: create a pin control subsystem v7

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 20 Sep 2011 14:58:05 -0700
From:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
To:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>
CC:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Linaro Dev <linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] drivers: create a pin control subsystem v7

Linus Walleij wrote at Friday, September 16, 2011 6:13 AM:
> This creates a subsystem for handling of pin control devices.
> These are devices that control different aspects of package
> pins.

I've read through the documentation and header files, but not the .c files,
and this looks almost perfect as far as I can tell right now. I'll try to
review the .c files sometime too.

I just have one comment:

> diff --git a/include/linux/pinctrl/pinmux.h b/include/linux/pinctrl/pinmux.h
...
> +/* External interface to pinmux */
> +extern int pinmux_request_gpio(unsigned gpio);
> +extern void pinmux_free_gpio(unsigned gpio);
> +extern struct pinmux * __must_check pinmux_get(struct device *dev, const char *name);
> +extern void pinmux_put(struct pinmux *pmx);
> +extern int pinmux_enable(struct pinmux *pmx);
> +extern void pinmux_disable(struct pinmux *pmx);
> +extern int pinmux_config(struct pinmux *pmx, u16 param, unsigned long *data);

That definition of pinmux_config doesn't seem as useful as it could be;
I'd like the ability to execute pinmux_config on a /named/ group, and I
can certainly see a use-case for applying it to /named/ pins too.

The issues with applying pinmux_config to a mapping table entry are:

* When there are multiple mapping table entries referenced by one
pinmux_get, you don't necessarily want to apply the same configuration
to all of the groups; think of a bus with a combination of low-speed
output control signals and high-speed input data signals or something
like that.

* When muxing works in groups, you may want to apply the configuration
to individual pins rather than the whole groups using in the mapping
table.

-- 
nvpublic

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/