linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Initialize pointer on request

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 22 Sep 2011 10:18:29 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	"Lucas C. Villa Real" <lucasvr@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Wey-Yi Guya <wey-yi.w.guy@...el.com>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Initialize pointer on request_firmware

On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:23:47AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 11:55:15PM -0300, Lucas C. Villa Real wrote:
> > Hello, folks,
> > 
> > I've seen some kernel oopses when suspending my machine. The problem comes from isight_firmware, which assumes that, on error, a call to request_firmware() will initialize the provided pointer to the firmware image to NULL.
> > 
> > The patch below fixes the isight_firmware side of the problem and also ensures that request_firmware() always sets the pointer to NULL on such cases (it currently does that for all except one situation).
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Lucas C. Villa Real <lucasvr@...olinux.org>
> > 
> > --- linux-3.0.4/drivers/base/firmware_class.c.orig	2011-09-21 21:03:01.000000000 -0300
> > +++ linux-3.0.4/drivers/base/firmware_class.c	2011-09-21 21:03:13.000000000 -0300
> > @@ -523,6 +523,7 @@ static int _request_firmware(const struc
> >  
> >  	if (WARN_ON(usermodehelper_is_disabled())) {
> >  		dev_err(device, "firmware: %s will not be loaded\n", name);
> > +		*firmware_p = NULL;
> >  		return -EBUSY;
> >  	}
> 
> Looks like f45f3c1f3f616 needs backporting to stable, if it hasn't
> happened yet.

What stable tree?  That patch was in the 2.6.36 release, so 3.0-stable
doesn't need it, right?

> Oh, and then there's caca9510ff4e5 too which adds this
> exit path to the goto out label as the rest of the function.

But that was only due to other problems.

Again, I don't understand what the issue really is here.

confused,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/