lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 14:31:30 +0800 From: Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com> To: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com> Cc: Barry Song <Baohua.Song@....com>, Piotr Ziecik <kosmo@...ihalf.com>, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>, Pelagicore AB <info@...agicore.com>, Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Yong Wang <yong.y.wang@...el.com>, dan.j.williams@...el.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: delete redundant chan_id and chancnt initialization in dma drivers 2011/9/22 Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>: > On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com> wrote: >> >>> client drivers can request a specific chan_id just like it can request a gpio. >> No dear. That's not gonna fly if we are to have common client drivers >> across SoCs. >> > Btw, I meant you can't simply have clients specify a channel number and > get the channel in a portable manner. Clients need to specify the capabilities > they need of the channel. if the dmac is flexible in design, what you said is right. but the problem is that there are some chips which actually fix one channel to one peripheral. -barry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists