| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 18:30:36 +0000 (UTC) From: Mark Wielaard <mjw@...hat.com> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3.1.0-rc4-tip 8/26] x86: analyze instruction and determine fixups. Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha <at> linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 02:12:25PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Do we now have sdt.h support for uprobes? That's one of the killer > > features that always seemed to get postponed. > > Not yet but it's a question of doing roughly what SystemTap does to > parse the appropriate ELF sections and then putting those probes into > uprobes. GDB now also implements this: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2011-04/msg00036.html Roland also posted a simple C based parser when he first suggested the new format: http://www.sourceware.org/ml/systemtap/2010-q3/msg00145.html There is a complete description of the elf note section, argument format and semaphore handling at: http://sourceware.org/systemtap/wiki/UserSpaceProbeImplementation Cheers, Mark -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists